AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT review roundup: a niche purchase

AMD has launched the latest member of its Radeon RX 6000 collection: the Radeon RX 6900 XT. The cardboard relies on the identical Navi 21 silicon as the remainder of the RX 6000 collection thus far and is being billed because the quickest Radeon card but. In response to evaluations, it’s a step up from earlier generations on the subject of efficiency, however not price its $1,000 price ticket for many shoppers.

Evaluations agree that this card is a racehorse. “That is one blistering-fast GPU,” concludes Brad Chacos of PCWorld, whereas Hot Hardware’s Marco Chiappetta dubbed it “probably the most highly effective Radeon ever.” In Tom’s Hardware’s testing, the RX 6900 XT averaged 85fps throughout its 13-game testing suite at 4K decision and extremely settings and 136.1fps at 1440p.

Picture: AMD

Reviewers additionally largely agree that the Radeon RX 6900 XT is a greater buy than Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 3090 for many players. The way in which {hardware} performs will all the time range by recreation, however PCWorld and Hilbert Hagedoorn of Guru3D report that the 6900 XT and the RTX 3090 achieved comparable body charges at decrease resolutions, whereas Nvidia pulled forward at greater resolutions. Because of the 6900 XT’s lower cost, each publications advocate it because the better-value buy.

Sizzling {Hardware} hedges a bit extra, noting that “the Radeon RX 6900 XT and the GeForce RTX 3090 are pretty nip and tuck, and commerce victories relying on the title, although the RTX 3090 does have the general edge.” Whereas the evaluate notes that AMD’s card is “well-positioned relative to competing choices from Nvidia,” Chiappetta additionally concludes that it “doesn’t definitively beat competitors.”

However AMD’s card is at a major drawback on the subject of ray tracing. Reviewers are break up on how necessary that is. Guru3D suggests not everybody cares about ray tracing, and so long as you don’t, AMD’s card is a greater purchase. Jarred Walton of Tom’s Hardware counters that folks contemplating playing cards which might be this costly shouldn’t overlook ray tracing; Walton doesn’t advocate the cardboard for common gaming.

However evaluations additionally agree that anybody who actually cares about worth may as nicely purchase the 6800 XT as an alternative — a extra inexpensive card that Verge senior editor Tom Warren discovered fairly capable of 4K and 1440p gaming. PCWorld emphasizes that the 6900 XT is actually supposed for content material creation professionals. And Tom’s {Hardware} laments that the 6900 XT is simply “4 to 7 p.c quicker” than the 6800 XT — “such an incremental bump in efficiency that it hardly appears well worth the bother.”

Total, it looks like the 6900 XT is a reasonably area of interest buy for folk who’re keen to drop $1,000 on a critically highly effective GPU however don’t thoughts a drawback on the subject of ray tracing. To be clear, although, that is all a theoretical dialogue at this level: these playing cards can be found in fairly restricted portions, and the primary batch of Radeon RX 6900 XT playing cards sold out in minutes this morning. However hey, it’s good to bear in mind for the longer term.

Source link

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply
Enable registration in settings - general
Compare items
  • Total (0)